Big Sky Debate

PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!! Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its March 2010 Public Forums resources on affirmative action!  The resolution, released by the National Forensics League on February 1, 2010, is:

Resolved: Affirmative action to promote equal opportunity in the United States is justified.

A list of briefs for this book appears below the fold.

Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate's seasoned research staff at THREE times that cost!  Big Sky Debate is the best value in debate.

Have a great month!!  Our Public Forum Resources are an unbeatable $12.00.  Big Sky Debate isn't more expensive, it is simply better.

PRO EVIDENCE

• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CREATES EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NECESSARY TO BATTLE TRADITIONAL POWER
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION STILL VIABLE IN A MODERN CONTEXT
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NECESSARY TO BATTLE EXISTING DISPARITIES
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NECESSARY TO BATTLE UNFAIR SELECTION SYSTEMS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NECESSARY TO BATTLE RACISM
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NECESSARY TO PROMOTE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROMOTES DIVERSITY
  
• DIVERSITY IS IMPORTANT TO ACADEMIC CAMPUS LIFE/CORPORATE LIFE
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HELPS THE BROADER COMMUNITY
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION JUSTIFIED AMONG MANY OTHER PREFERENCE POLICIES
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CRITICISM IS A MOSTLY BUZZWORD AND NOT SUBSTANTIAL
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION WORKS
  
• AMERICANS SUPPORT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
  
• CALIFORNIA/WASHINGTON PROVE: ELIMINATING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HURTS MINORITY COLLEGE PARTICIPATION
  
• A/T: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION = REVERSE RACISM
  
• A/T: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION = STIGMA
  
• A/T: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION MASKS UNDERLYING PROBLEM IN SCHOOLS
  
• A/T: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DOESN’T SOLVE RACISM
  
• A/T: AMERICA IS COLORBLIND
  
• A/T: UNQUALIFIED MINORITIES ARE ADVANTAGED BY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
  
• A/T: ASIAN AMERICANS ARE DISCRIMINATED BY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICIES
  
• A/T: SANDERS STUDY
  

CON EVIDENCE

• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION WRONG TOOL TO FIGHT RACISM
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HURTS MINORITY SELF-PERCEPTION
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLACES MINORITIES IN THE WRONG PROGRAMS FOR THEIR NEEDS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION LOWERS STANDARDS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION LEADS TO HIGHER MINORITY DROPOUT RATES AT SCHOOLS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION MAKES A MOCKERY OF EQUALITY
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS REVERSE RACISM
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION LEADS TO FAILURE AMONG MINORITIES IN THE WORKPLACE
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DOESN’T REPRESENT MODERN AMERICAN PROBLEMS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BASED ON HISTORICAL JUSTIFICATIONS DOESN’T MAKE SENSE TO MODERN MINORITIES
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ADVANCEMENTS BY MINORITIES
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DIFFICULT IN MODERN TIMES DUE TO THE LACK OF CLEAR DEFINITIONS OF MINORITIES
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION MASKS THE UNDERLYING PROBLEMS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NOT SUPPORTED BY AMERICANS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DISCRIMINATES AGAINST SOME MINORITY GROUPS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NOT JUSTIFIED: NO RACISM EXISTS IN PROFESSIONAL CAREERS
  
• AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NOT JUSTIFIED: MINORITIES DOING WELL IN THE UNITED STATES
  
• CALIFORNIA/WASHINGTON PROVE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION NOT NEEDED FOR MINORITY SUCCESS
  
• MUST STOP AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SOONER THAN LATER
  
• A/T: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS NECESSARY TO CREATE DIVERSITY
  
• A/T: DIVERSITY IS NECESSARY