|
Written by Jason Neiffer
|
|
Saturday, 22 May 2010 00:00 |
|
PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!! Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its 2010 NFL Nationals Public Forum resources on democratic deliveration! The resolution, released by the National Forensics League on May 1, 2010, is:
Resolved: Current trends in American political dialogue compromise
meaningful democratic deliberation.
A list of briefs for this book appears below the fold. Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate's seasoned research staff at THREE times that cost! Big Sky Debate is the best value in debate.
Have a great national tournament!! Our Public Forum Resources are an unbeatable $12.00. Big Sky Debate isn't more expensive, it is simply better.

METADEBATE
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY
DEFINED
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY HAS FOUR CRITICAL
PRINCIPLES
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY REQUIRES COLLECTIVE
DECISION-MAKING AND PARTICIPATION
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY REQUIRES
DELIBERATIVE INSTITUTIONS
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY REQUIRES MUTUAL
RESPECT
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY REQUIRES A SLOW DEMOCRATIC
PROCESS
PRO EVIDENCE - PUBLIC IGNORANCE COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- MISINFORMATION CAMPAIGNS COMPROMISE DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- CURRENT MEDIA CLIMATE COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- THE INTERNET FILTER PROCESS COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- LOBBYING COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- MEDIA/INTERNET FILTER COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION THROUGH FRAMING
- CURRENT TONE COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- AGGRESSIVE COURTS COMPROMISE DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD: SHOULD BE THE GOAL OF
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD: LEAVES THE
FUTURE FLEXIBLE FOR RECONSIDERATION
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD:
DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION CAN MEAN SOLUTIONS TO DIFFICULT
QUESTIONS
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD: BRINGS LEGITIMACY TO
GOVERNMENT
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD: INVOLVED MINORITY VOICES IN
DECISION-MAKING
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD: DELIBERATION DECREASES
DIFFERENCES
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY GOOD: CAN INFORM THE
PUBLIC
- A/T: DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY PUTS NOVICES IN CHARGE OF
POLICY
CON EVIDENCE
- CIVIL POLITICAL DEMANDS BAD: UNREALISTIC IN
POLITICS
- DIVERSITY OF TONE IN POLITICS CRITICAL
- SHARP TONE IS A
CRITICAL POLITICAL TOOL
- POLITICAL VIOLENCE CAN BE JUSTIFIED IN A
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT
- CURRENT CLIMATE ENCOURAGES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- THE INTERNET ENHANCES DEMOCRATIC
DELIBERATION
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IS IMPOSSIBLE
- DELIBERATIVE
DEMOCRACY BAD: BENEFITS OVERSTATED
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY BAD: SOME
DECISIONS SHOULDN’T BE SUBJECT TO DELIBERATION
- DELIBERATIVE
DEMOCRACY BAD: DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY USED TO TWEAK PUBLIC
OPINION
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY BAD: MANY MUST RELY ON OTHERS FOR
COMPLEX POLITICAL ISSUES
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY BAD: ATTEMPTING TO
PERSUADE OTHERS CAN BE DANGEROUS
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY BAD: HURTS
PUBLIC WELFARE
- DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY BAD: DOESN’T ALLOW FOR
RESOLUTION OTHER THAN COMPROMISE
- A/T: PARTISANSHIP IS BAD
- A/T:
CONFLICT COMPROMISES DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 11 June 2010 13:32 |