Menu
Cart
Book Cover

Nationals 2019 NSDA Public Forum: Antitrust for Big Tech

  • $ 16.00


PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!!

Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its Nationals 2019 NSDA Public Forum resources on the Antitrust for Big Tech!

The resolution released by the National Speech and Debate Association is:

Resolved: The United States federal government should enforce antitrust regulations on technology giants.

A list of briefs for this book appears below.

Continued this season: Get both the PDF and Word versions of the book. Copy and paste Big Sky Debate’s excellent research into your own briefs OR print and file the old-fashioned way!

Why choose Big Sky Debate over the competitors? We have one of the longest-standing Public Forum resource services in the nation.  Topic after topic, the Big Sky team delivers fresh, relevant and useful evidence and briefs for successful debate, no matter your location.

Download one brief, right now… don’t wait around for complex update services that are delivered after you are done with the topic!

Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate’s seasoned research staff at THREE times that cost! Big Sky Debate is the best value in debate!

Download one file, right now, with all the resources you need for this topic. Have a GREAT topic!!! Our Public Forum Resources are an unbeatable $16.00.

Good luck at nationals!

Antitrust for Big Tech Index

PRO

  • BIG TECH DOMINANCE: GOOGLE
  • BIG TECH DOMINANCE: FACEBOOK
  • BIG TECH DOMINANCE: AMAZON
  • BIG TECH DOMINANCE: APPLE
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: MUST ACT NOW
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: IMPACT OF PLATFORMS ON OUR LIVES JUSTIFIES REGULATION
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: ADDICTION JUSTIFIES REGULATION
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: TECH HARMS CHILDREN
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORS VIEWS
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: IMPACT ON CONSUMERS AND WORKERS JUSTIFIES REGULATION
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: BIG TECH KILLING NEWSPAPERS
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: IMPACT ON DEMOCRACY AND ELECTION JUSTIFIES ACTION 
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: BIG TECH = MONOPOLIES 
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: ANTI COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR JUSTIFIES REGULATION
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: MASSIVE PROFITS JUSTIFY REGULATION
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: REGULATION COUPLED WITH USER ACTIONS WILL SOLVE
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: POLITICAL SUPPORT EXISTS ACROSS THE SPECTRUM
  • REGULATION JUSTIFIED: PUBLIC SUPPORTS
  • REGULATION EFFECTIVE: CONGRESS MUST ACT
  • REGULATION EFFECTIVE: WE SHOULD CREATE AGENCIES TO REGULATE
  • REGULATION EFFECTIVE: US HISTORICALLY INTERVENES IN CONCENTRATED INDUSTRIES
  • REGULATION EFFECTIVE: ANTITRUST ISN’T TOO COMPLICATED
  • REGULATION EFFECTIVE: OUR CURRENT SITUATION IS DUE TO LAX ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT
  • REGULATION EFFECTIVE: BREAK UP BIG TECH
  • CON SOURCES BIASED
  • A/T: BIG TECH BRINGING UTOPIA
  • A/T: MUST NOT BREAK UP BIG TECH
  • A/T: STARTUPS WILL TURN OVER BIG TECH PLAYERS
  • A/T: INDUSTRY WILL SELF-REGULATE
  • A/T: EU ACTION IS ENOUGH
  • A/T: FREEDOM! CAPITALISM!
  • A/T: REGULATION WILL BANKRUPT BIG TECH
  • A/T: USERS WILL VOTE WITH THEIR FEET
  • A/T: MUST PRIORITIZE INNOVATION
  • A/T: ANTITRUST WON’T SOLVE ANYTHING
  • A/T: ANTITRUST HURTS USER EXPERIENCE

CON

  • BALANCE CON: REGULATION AND INNOVATION BOTH REQUIRED, CAN’T PRIORITIZE ONE OVER THE OTHER
  • BALANCE CON: ANTITRUST IS COMPLICATED AND SHOULD BE LEFT TO THE COURTS IN INDIVIDUAL CASES
  • BALANCE CON: BROAD BRUSH THINKING FROM PRO WON’T BE EFFECTIVE
  • ANTITRUST INEFFECTIVE: ANTITRUST IS THE WRONG TOOL TO BATTLE HARMS
  • ANTITRUST INEFFECTIVE: TOOLS FOR ANTITRUST TOO COMPLICATED
  • ANTITRUST INEFFECTIVE: TOOLSET IS OLD AND ANTIQUATED
  • ANTITRUST INEFFECTIVE: POWER IN BIG TECH PLAYERS REGULARLY CHANGE
  • ANTITRUST INEFFECTIVE: DOESN’T PROVIDE LASTING IMPACT
  • ANTITRUST INEFFECTIVE: OTHER GLOBAL PLAYERS CAN STEP IN FOR BIG TECH
  • ANTITRUST BAD: EVEN IF JUSTIFIED, WE MUST HAVE A VIABLE TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY
  • ANTITRUST BAD: FINES INEFFECTIVE
  • ALTERNATIVE TO ANTITRUST: DATA PRIVACY LAWS
  • ALTERNATIVE TO ANTITRUST: CODES OF CONDUCT
  • ALTERNATIVE TO ANTITRUST: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION
  • ANTITRUST IMPOSSIBLE: COMPLEXITIES OF TECHNOLOGY RENDER ANTITRUST ACTION DIFFICULT/IMPOSSIBLE
  • ANTITRUST BAD: PEOPLE LIKE BIG TECH
  • ANTITRUST BAD: MARKETS SHOULD BE FREEEEEEEE
  • ANTITRUST BAD: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
  • ANTITRUST BAD: COULD MEAN CENSORSHIP
  • ANTITRUST BAD: STIFLES INNOVATION
  • ANTITRUST BAD: HURTS CONSUMERS
  • ANTITRUST BAD: WE SHOULDN’T LET FACEBOOK COLOR OUR PERCEPTION OF ALL TECH
  • ANTITRUST BAD: WE SHOULDN’T GIVE INTO POPULIST PASSIONS
  • BIG TECH IS OKAY: GOOGLE DOESN’T WANT TO BE EVIL
  • US ACTION MOOT: CONSUMERS ARE VOTING WITH THEIR FEET
  • US ACTION MOOT: EUROPEANS ARE DOING THE DIRTY WORK
  • A/T: SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORS CONSERVATIVE VOICES

                            We Also Recommend