Menu
Cart
2020 NSDA Nationals Public Forum: Charter Schools

2020 NSDA Nationals Public Forum: Charter Schools

  • $ 16.00


PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!!

Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its 2020 NSDA Nationals Public Forum resources on charter schools!

The resolution, released by the National Speech and Debate Association on May 1, 2020, is:

Resolved: On balance, charter schools are beneficial to the quality of education in the United States.

A list of briefs for this book appears below.

Get both the PDF and Word versions of the book. Copy and paste Big Sky Debate’s excellent research into your own briefs OR print and file the old-fashioned way!

Why choose Big Sky Debate over the competitors? We have one of the longest-standing Public Forum resource services in the nation.  Topic after topic, the Big Sky team delivers fresh, relevant, and useful evidence and briefs for successful debate, no matter your location.

Download one brief, right now… don’t wait around for complex update services that are delivered after you are done with the topic!

Download one file, right now, with all the resources you need for this topic. Have a GREAT topic!!! Our Public Forum Resources are an unbeatable $16.00. 

Charter Schools Index


META

  • CHARTER SCHOOL DEFINED 
  • “CHOICE” NATURE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS MAKES RESEARCH POTENTIALLY BIASED 
  • STUDENT INPUTS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR IN SCHOOL SUCCESS 
  • CHARTER RESEARCH IS POORLY DESIGNED 

PRO 

  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: GROWING 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: THEY PROVIDE SOLUTIONS TO ALL STAKEHOLDERS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: BRING SUCCESSFUL RESULTS FOR STUDENTS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: HELP STUDENTS WITH SPECIFIC, INDIVIDUAL NEEDS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: PROVIDE FOCUSED SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: INCREASE PARENT SATISFACTION 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: INCREASE STAKEHOLDER SATISFACTION 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: THEY MEET AN IDENTIFIED COMMUNITY NEED 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: CHARTERS PROVIDE COMPETITION WHICH IMPROVES SCHOOLS OVERALL 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: ENCOURAGE INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGY 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL SYSTEMS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: CHARTERS GOOD FROM GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY AND INFLUENCE 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: BETTER FOR TEACHERS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: BETTER FOR MINORITY STUDENTS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: VIRTUAL CHARTERS PROVIDE GOOD OPTIONS TO STUDENTS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS GOOD: VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOLS SERVE UNDERSERVED STUDENTS 
  • CHARTERS PREVENTED FROM SUCCESS: TEACHERS UNION STOP REFORMS 
  • CHARTERS PREVENTED FROM SUCCESS: CHARTERS ARE CHRONICALLY UNDERFUNDED 
  • CHARTERS PREVENTED FROM SUCCESS: ENROLLMENT IS CAPPED 
  • CHARTERS PREVENTED FROM SUCCESS: CHARTERS AREN’T FREE TO INNOVATE 
  • PUBLIC SCHOOLS BAD: FAILURES ARE WIDESPREAD 
  • PUBLIC SCHOOLS BAD: AFRAID OF CHANGE 
  • PUBLIC SCHOOLS BAD: ADMINISTRATORS ARE AFRAID OF NEW METHODS AND REFORMS 
  • A/T: CHARTER SCHOOLS LACK ACCOUNTABILITY 

CON 

  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTER SCHOOLS AREN’T WHAT THE CREATORS INTENDED 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTER SCHOOLS PROVIDE NO BENEFIT OVER THE PUBLIC SCHOOL MODEL 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS DO NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE ROOT CAUSES OF POOR SCHOOL PERFORMANCE 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: PULL FUNDING AWAY FROM PUBLIC SCHOOLS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: THEY ARE A TOOL FOR PRIVATIZING SCHOOLS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS ARE BECOMING FUNDING-PREFERED STRATEGIES IN STATES 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS LACK FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS FACE NO ACCOUNTABILITY 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS LACK LOCAL/SCHOOL BOARD OVERSIGHT 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: ALLOWED TO STUDENTS DIFFERENTLY 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS USE UNQUALIFIED TEACHERS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: HURTS MINORITY STUDENTS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS AGAINST CHARTERS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: HURT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTER SCHOOLS WON’T EVEN ENROLL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS AREN’T SET UP TO PROVIDE NEEDED EDUCATION TO STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: LOCAL SUCCESS CAN’T BE REPLICATED/SCALED 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: CHARTERS DON’T IMPROVE NON-CHARTER SCHOOLS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOLS FAIL STUDENTS 
  • CHARTER SCHOOLS BAD: “CHOICE”-BASED REFORM DOESN’T WORK 
  • PUBLIC SCHOOLS GOOD: PARENTS ARE HAPPY WITH THEIR LOCAL SCHOOLS 
  • PUBLIC SCHOOLS GOOD: EXISTING MODELS ARE ABLE TO OVERCOME SUCCESS BARRIERS 
  • ALTERNATIVE ADVOCACY: REFORM SCHOOLS IN OTHER WAYS 
  • ALTERNATIVE ADVOCACY: GIVE MORE MONEY TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS WITHOUT ADVANTAGING DESTRUCTIVE MODELS 
  • ALTERNATIVE ADVOCACY: HIRE BETTER SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 
  • ALTERNATIVE ADVOCACY: STRENGTHEN THE EDUCATION PROFESSION 
  • A/T: CHARTERS ARE NON-PROFIT 
  • A/T: CHARTERS PROVIDE OPTIONS FOR ALL 
  • A/T: CHARTER SCHOOLS ARE INCUBATORS FOR SUCCESSFUL EDUCATION PRACTICE 
  • A/T: CHARTERS PROVIDE CHOICE 
  • A/T: PUBLIC SCHOOLS NEED REFORMS 
  • A/T: PARENTS LIKE CHARTER SCHOOLS 
  • A/T: THE PROBLEM IS UNIONS 
  • A/T: SCHOOLS NEED COMPETITION