Menu
Cart
Book Cover

Nationals 2019 NSDA Lincoln-Douglas: Violent Revolution

  • $ 25.00


PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!!

Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its Nationals 2019 NSDA Lincoln- Douglas resources on violent revolution!

The resolution released by the National Speech and Debate Association is:

Resolved: Violent revolution is a just response to political oppression.

A list of briefs for this book appears below.

Continued this season: Get both the PDF and Word versions of the book. Copy and paste Big Sky Debate’s excellent research into your own briefs, or, print out the PDF and file the old-fashioned way!

As in the past, you can expect our evidence to be timely and to the core of the topic. Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate’s seasoned research staff at three to five times the cost!  Why pay more?

Have a GREAT topic!!! Our NSDA LD resources are an unbeatable $25.00.

Good luck at nationals!!!

Violent Revolution Index

AFFIRMATIVE

  • VIOLENCE JUSTIFIED: INJUSTICE JUSTIFIES USING ALL OPTIONS
  • VIOLENCE JUSTIFIED: LEADERS THAT DON’T PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS ARE SUBJECT TO VIOLENT RESPONSES
  • VIOLENCE JUSTIFIED: RESTORING HUMAN DIGNITY JUSTIFIES USING VIOLENCE AS A TOOL
  • VIOLENCE JUSTIFIED: EMPOWERS THE OPPRESSED
  • VIOLENCE JUSTIFIED: VIOLENCE IS IMPORTANT, SO, WE SHOULD FOCUS ON MINIMIZING DAMAGE
  • VIOLENCE JUSTIFIED: PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: CLAIMS OF EQUALITY/CIVIL RIGHTS ARE HALF-MEASURES
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: SYSTEMS OF THE OPPRESSOR DON’T PROVIDE JUSTICE OR RELIEF
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: OPPRESSORS WON’T BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR PRIVILEGE
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: THE OPPRESSED DON’T HAVE THE MEANS TO ENGAGE IN EXISTING SYSTEMS
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: WE MUST HAVE OTHER OPTIONS IF NON-VIOLENCE FAILS
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: VIOLENCE IS NEEDED TO BACK UP NON-VIOLENT MOVEMENTS
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: REQUIRED FOR CHANGE
  • VIOLENCE NECESSARY: NON-VIOLENCE INEFFECTIVE
  • NON-VIOLENCE BAD: NON-VIOLENT REVOLUTIONS ARE A MYTH
  • NON-VIOLENCE BAD: IT IS A MEANS OF CONTROL BY THE OPPRESSORS
  • NON-VIOLENCE BAD: NON-VIOLENCE CO-OPTS THE OPPRESSED
  • NON-VIOLENCE BAD: IT IS NOTHING MORE THAN THEATER
  • A/T: VIOLENCE IS ABHORRENT
  • A/T: RULE OF LAW IS PARAMOUNT
  • A/T: DEMOCRACIES PROTECT MINORITIES
  • A/T: CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT USES NON-VIOLENCE FOR SUCCESS
  • A/T: VIOLENCE IN INEFFECTIVE
  • A/T: GANDHI EXAMPLES

NEGATIVE

  • BALANCE NEGATIVE: MUST THOUGHTFULLY APPLY VIOLENCE
  • BALANCE NEGATIVE: VIOLENCE MUST BE LIMITED TO TIMES WHERE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE FAILS
  • BALANCE NEGATIVE: WE SHOULD REJECT RIGID FORMULAS ON THE USE OF VIOLENCE
  • NON-VIOLENCE SUPERIOR: MORE SUCCESSFUL
  • NON-VIOLENCE SUPERIOR: STRATEGICALLY SUPERIOR
  • NON-VIOLENCE SUPERIOR: OPPRESSORS OVERREACT TO NON-VIOLENCE
  • NON-VIOLENCE SUPERIOR: NON-VIOLENCE MORE SYMPATHETIC TO THIRD PARTIES
  • NON-VIOLENCE SUPERIOR: MORE LIKELY TO APPEAL TO THE MASSES
  • CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: BETTER ALTERNATIVE
  • CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: EFFECTIVE HISTORICALLY
  • CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: HELPS MEET CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY
  • CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: EFFECTIVE WITHOUT LOSS OF LIFE
  • CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: EFFECTIVE IN THE FRAMEWORK OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT
  • CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: EFFECTIVE IN PROVIDING VOICES TO THE MARGINALIZED
  • VIOLENCE INEFFECTIVE: TERRORISTS AREN’T SUCCESSFUL

                    We Also Recommend