Menu
Cart

Spring 2021 UIL Lincoln-Douglas: Digital Privacy vs Public Security

  • $ 40.00


PURCHASE AND DOWNLOAD RIGHT NOW!!

Big Sky Debate is pleased to release its Spring 2021 UIL Lincoln-Douglas resources on digital privacy vs public security!

The resolution, released by the Texas UIL in December, is:

RESOLVED: When in conflict, digital privacy ought to be valued above public security.

A list of briefs for this book appears below.

Continued this season: Get both the PDF and Word versions of the book. Copy and paste Big Sky Debate’s excellent research into your own briefs!

As in the past, you can expect our evidence to be timely and to the core of the topic.  Compare similar services without Big Sky Debate’s seasoned research staff at three to five times the cost!  Why pay more?

Have a GREAT topic!!! Our UIL LD resources are an unbeatable $40.00.

Or, try one of our Texas packages!

Digital Privacy Index

 

AFFIRMATIVE

PRIVACY IS ESSENTIAL 

COMMUNITARIANISM IS FLAWED 

  • COMMUNITARIANISM MAKES NO SENSE 
  • COMMUNITARIANISM IS HOPELESSLY UNCLEAR 
  • COMMUNITARIANISM UNDERMINES HUMAN RIGHTS 
  • WE CAN PROTECT RIGHTS AND BE COMMUNITARIAN 

CIVIL LIBERTIES GENERAL 

  • SHOULD NOT CURB LIBERTY FOR SECURITY 
  • GIVING TOO MANY SURVEILLANCE POWERS RISKS AUTHORITARIANISM 
  • AMERICAN DON’T SUPPORT DEGRADATION OF LIBERTIES, EVEN FOR SECURITY 
  • 4TH AMENDMENT HAS SUFFERED TO FIGHT TERRORISM 
  • OUR RIGHTS FRAMEWORK ALREADY BALANCES THINGS LIKE SECURITY IN PROTECTING RIGHTS 
  • AMERICAN SURVEILLANCE IS EXPORTED AND EXPLOITED 
  • POLICES CENTERED ON NATIONAL SECURITY ONLY ARE PRONE TO ABUSE 
  • PROMISES THAT CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE KEPT IN MIND ARE UNPERSUASIVE 
  • MUST STOP INCREMENTAL DIMINISHMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES 
  • GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE HURTS FREE EXPRESSION 

SPECIFIC PROGRAMS

  • ENCRYPTION 
  • METADATA COLLECTION 
  • REMOTE BIOMETRIC SURVEILLANCE 
  • SURVEILLANCE IS OUTSOURCED TO CORPORATIONS W/ LITTLE OVERSIGHT 
  • HARMS: PRIVATE CONTRACTORS HAVE ACCESS TO EVERYTHING 
  • OUTSOURCED SURVEILLANCE UNDERMINES GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 
  • INTEL COMMUNITY USES PRIVATIZATION TO EVADE CONGRESS 
  • OUTSOURCING INCREASES THE COSTS OF INTEL/PROFITEERING 
  • THE REVOLVING DOOR INCREASES SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS 
  • PRIVATIZATION UNDERMINES GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE EFFICACY 
  • PRIVATIZATION LEADS TO CORRUPTION 
  • OUTSOURCING LEADS TO EXPANDED SURVEILLANCE 
  • OUTSOURCING LEADS TO AUTHORITARIANISM 
  • OUTSOURCING OF INTEL IS TOTALITARIAN 

A/T SEX TRAFFICKING 

  • HYSTERIA 
  • HYPERBOLIC CLAIMS ABOUT SEX TRAFFICKING UNDERMINE POLICY 
  • FOCUS ON SEX TRAFFICKING HARMS WOMEN 
  • A/T TERRORISM 

A/T CYBER WAR 

  • CYBER WAR 
  • CYBER WAR THREAT IMAGINARY 

CRITICAL ARGUMENTS 

  • A/T WE SURVEIL OURSELVES 

A/T GENDER 

NEGATIVE 

PRIVACY 

  • PRIVACY NEGATIVE 
  • PRIVACY IS NOT CRITICAL FOR DEMOCRACY 
  • EXCESSIVE FOCUS ON PRIVACY DANGEROUS 

COMMUNITARIANISM 

  • REJECT ABSOLUTIST POSITIONS ON PRIVACY 
  • COMMUNITARIANISM: WE MUST COLLECTIVELY SACRIFICE TO ADDRESS TERRORISM 
  • COMMUNITARIANISM: WE MUST FOCUS ON THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE 
  • COMMUNITARIANISM BETTER PROTECTS RIGHTS 

SPECIFIC PROGRAMS/HARMS 

  • CYBER WAR 
  • ENCRYPTION GENERAL 
  • END TO END ENCRYPTION UNDERMINES LAW ENFORCEMENT 
  • END TO END ENCRYPTION INCREASES CHILD PREDATION 
  • END TO END ENCRYPTION ENABLES TERRORISTS 

LAW ENFORCEMENT GENERAL 

  • WE CAN BALANCE PRIVACY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT 
  • WARRANTS PROTECT PRIVACY 

NSA 

  • MODEST REFORMS WILL FIX THE NSA 
  • THE NSA RARELY MAKES MISTAKES IN SURVEILLANCE TARGETS 
  • NSA CRITICISM IS OVERSTATED 
  • METADATA COLLECTION IS LEGAL/CONSTITUTIONAL 
  • A WARRANT IS STILL REQUIRED TO LOOK AT THE DATA 
  • PRISM DOES NOT VIOLATE PRIVACY 
  • PRISM DID NOT GIVE DIRECT ACCESS TO CORPORATE SERVERS 
  • PRISM SEARCHES DO NOT TARGET AMERICANS 
  • THE NSA MINIMIZES COLLECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION 
  • EO12333 DOES NOT VIOLATE PRIVACY 
  • THE FISA COURT DOES OFFER MEANINGFUL OVERSIGHT 
  • OVERLY RESTRICTING THE NSA WILL LEAD TO TERRORISM 
  • CONSTRAINING THE NSA WILL NOT INCREASE PRIVACY 
  • IMPACT CALCULUS JUSTIFIES NSA SURVEILLANCE 
  • AFF CAN’T SOLVE. THE NSA WILL JUST IGNORE 
  • EXCESSIVE CRITICISM OF NSA WEAKENS AMERICAN POWER 
  • EXCESSIVE CRITICISM LEADS TO DANGEROUS PRIVATIZATION 

US SURVEILLANCE IS DEMOCRATIC 

  • US SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS ARE UNIQUELY DEMOCRATIC AND ACCOUNTABLE 
  • NSA SURVEILLANCE IS A LEGITIMATE FUNCTION OF GOVERNMENT 

SEX TRAFFICKING 

  • GENERAL 
  • SURVEILLANCE NEEDED TO DETECT HUMAN TRAFFICKERS 
  • SURVEILLANCE TECH NEEDED TO PREVENT TRAFFICKING 
  • MORAL IMPERATIVE TO COMBAT TRAFFICKING 

TERRORISM 

  • TERRORISM: GENERAL 
  • TERRORISM IS A GROWING THREAT IN THE US 
  • METADATA COLLECTION PREVENTS TERRORIST ATTACKS 
  • ONLY MASS SURVEILLANCE WORKS 
  • PRISM PREVENTS TERRORIST ATTACKS 
  • THE IMPACT OF TERRORISM MEANS IT ALWAYS OUTWEIGHS

LAW ENFORCEMENT COMPARISON FLAWED 

  • THE US CANNOT ALLOW RESTRICTION OF INTEL INFORMATION SHARING 
  • CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARD CANNOT BE APPLIED TO NSA 

CRITICAL ARGUMENTS 

  • CRITIQUE OF AFF: WE SURRENDER OUR PRIVACY WILLINGLY 
  • SURVEILLANCE OF BLACKNESS CRITIQUE OF AFF 
  • SURVEILLANCE IS NOT NEUTRAL, BUT GENDERED